| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
| Date: | 2021-04-08 22:55:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYvrayTL50yzwoCav1tm+X_en6VsFQqjZDK=on4wLr1hg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:51 PM Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> #2 is if chunk_seq goes up but skips numbers. #3 is if chunk_seq ever goes down, meaning the index scan did something unexpected.
Yeah, sure. But I think we could probably treat those the same way.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-04-08 23:01:03 | Re: SQL-standard function body |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-04-08 22:51:41 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |