| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "stark(at)mit(dot)edu" <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging |
| Date: | 2021-03-23 05:24:28 |
| Message-ID: | YFl7jE1hO983JRcu@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:22:52PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The 0002/0001/whateveritisaftertherebase is tracked over at
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/92e70110-9273-d93c-5913-0bccb6562740(at)dunslane(dot)net
> isn't it? I've assumed the expectation is to have that one committed
> from that thread, and then rebase using that.
Independent and useful pieces could just be extracted and applied
separately where it makes sense. I am not sure if that's the case
here, so I'll do a patch_to_review++.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-03-23 05:30:49 | Re: proposal - psql - use pager for \watch command |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-03-23 05:22:46 | Re: replication cleanup code incorrect way to use of HTAB HASH_REMOVE ? |