Re: intermittently fails

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: intermittently fails
Date: 2021-03-06 01:25:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:16:55AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> That would have uncertain effects on other TAP tests, so I'm disinclined
> to do it that way.

+1. There may be tests out-of-core that rely on this value as

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-06 01:30:33 Re: Parallel Full Hash Join
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-06 00:35:59 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq