Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails
Date: 2021-03-08 00:31:58
Message-ID: 20210308.093158.97250093438471511.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:25:46 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:16:55AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > That would have uncertain effects on other TAP tests, so I'm disinclined
> > to do it that way.
>
> +1. There may be tests out-of-core that rely on this value as
> default.

On second thougt, that difference can be said to have revealed the
problem. Agreed.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-03-08 00:39:15 Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-08 00:30:30 Re: is cfbot's apply aging intentional?