| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Printing LSN made easy |
| Date: | 2021-01-20 07:40:59 |
| Message-ID: | YAfeizFQtFdWwGas@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It looks like we are not getting any consensus on this approach. One
> reduced version I would consider is just the second part, so you'd write
> something like
>
> snprintf(lsnchar, sizeof(lsnchar), "%X/%X",
> LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(lsn));
>
> This would still reduce notational complexity quite a bit but avoid any
> funny business with the format strings.
That seems reasonable to me. So +1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-01-20 07:48:15 | Re: Discarding DISCARD ALL |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-01-20 07:38:45 | Re: Release SPI plans for referential integrity with DISCARD ALL |