Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails
Date: 2023-01-25 01:32:10
Message-ID: Y9CGmmiaz1IltXPk@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:42:06PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> That systemd behavior affects IPC resources regardless of what process
> created them.

Thanks, my memory was fuzzy regarding that. I am curious if the error
in the recovery tests will persist with that set up. The next run
will be in a few hours, so let's see..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2023-01-25 01:37:29 Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-01-25 01:30:20 Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)