Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails
Date: 2023-01-25 05:04:24
Message-ID: Y9C4WFpEfL/0MRe5@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:32:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks, my memory was fuzzy regarding that. I am curious if the error
> in the recovery tests will persist with that set up. The next run
> will be in a few hours, so let's see..

So it looks like tanaget is able to reproduce the failure of this
thread much more frequently than the other animals:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tanager&dt=2023-01-25%2003%3A05%3A05

That's interesting. FWIW, this environment is just a Raspberry PI 4
with 8GB of memory with clang.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-01-25 05:37:17 pgsql: Rename contrib module basic_archive to basic_wal_module
Previous Message shveta malik 2023-01-25 05:02:09 Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)