Re: GetNewObjectId question

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GetNewObjectId question
Date: 2022-12-11 01:31:37
Message-ID: Y5Uy+VLdSOTNANUG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 07:11:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, that looks like somebody didn't read the memo.
> Want to submit a patch?

The comment has been added in e3ce2de but the call originates from
6566133, so that's a HEAD-only issue.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-12-11 02:11:21 Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-11 00:22:11 Re: -Wunreachable-code-generic-assoc warnings on elver