| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GetNewObjectId question |
| Date: | 2022-12-11 06:12:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1587178.1670739154@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 07:11:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, that looks like somebody didn't read the memo.
>> Want to submit a patch?
> The comment has been added in e3ce2de but the call originates from
> 6566133, so that's a HEAD-only issue.
Ah, good that the bug hasn't made it to a released version yet.
But that comment is *way* older than e3ce2de; it's been touched
a couple of times, but it dates to 721e53785 AFAICS.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-12-11 06:33:34 | Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2022-12-11 05:42:13 | Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql |