Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date: 2022-11-19 06:00:15
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Fixed that, and the other mistake Álvaro spotted, and also bumped
> catversion because I forgot that earlier.

I was looking at this code yesterday, to see today that psql's
completion should be completed with this new clause, similary to ADMIN

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgsql-set-clause.patch text/x-diff 2.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-11-19 06:05:30 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2022-11-19 05:28:11 Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE