| From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE |
| Date: | 2022-11-19 05:28:11 |
| Message-ID: | e369e0f3-648e-115a-b7e4-9185cdec3b98@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Op 18-11-2022 om 22:19 schreef Robert Haas:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:50 PM Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> In grant.sgml,
>>
>> 'actualy permisions'
>>
>> looks a bit unorthodox.
>
> Fixed that, and the other mistake Álvaro spotted, and also bumped
> catversion because I forgot that earlier.
Sorry to be nagging but
'permisions' should be
'permissions'
as well.
And as I'm nagging anyway: I also wondered whether the word order could
improve:
- Word order as it stands:
However, the actual permissions conferred depend on the options
associated with the grant.
-- maybe better:
However, the permissions actually conferred depend on the options
associated with the grant.
But I'm not sure.
Thanks,
Erik
Thanks,
Erik
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-11-19 06:00:15 | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-11-19 03:12:24 | More efficient build farm animal wakeup? |