Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests
Date: 2022-11-16 07:06:54
Message-ID: Y3SMDoHfS8sy2wwW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:36:34AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Maybe I should just add a basic Assert here, to trip if someone adds a
> new SASL mechanism, and point that lucky person to this thread with a
> comment?

I am beginning to look at the last version proposed, which has been
marked as RfC. Does this patch need a refresh in light of a9e9a9f and
0873b2d? The changes for libpq_append_conn_error() should be
straight-forward.

The CF bot is still happy.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Himanshu Upadhyaya 2022-11-16 07:11:13 Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-16 06:59:33 Re: Small miscellaneous fixes