Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Date: 2023-02-13 00:11:53
Message-ID: Y+mASYCYYil4oYkV@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 04:40:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> v2 looks good to me as far as it goes.

Thanks. I have applied that after an extra lookup.

> I agree these other questions deserve a separate look.

Okay, I may be able to come back to that. Another point is that we
need to do a better job in forcing the execution of the query jumbling
in one of the TAP tests running pg_regress, outside
pg_stat_statements, to maximize coverage. Will see to that on a
separate thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-02-13 01:15:13 Re: [PATCH] Add pretty-printed XML output option
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2023-02-12 23:58:23 Re: Making Vars outer-join aware