Re: Proposed patch for key managment

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date: 2020-12-16 00:36:22
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:09:09PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Yeah, looking at what's been done there seems like the right approach to
> me as well, ideally we'd have one set of APIs that'll support all these
> use cases (not unlike what curl does..).

Ooh... This is interesting. What did curl do wrong here? It is
always good to hear from such past experiences.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-12-16 00:45:17 Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-16 00:30:36 Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol