Re: doc review for v14

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc review for v14
Date: 2020-12-29 09:22:43
Message-ID: X+r1YyXWE5obOazQ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 02:26:05PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I think a couple of these should be backpatched.
> doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml

This part can go down to 9.5.

> doc/src/sgml/sources.sgml

Yes, I have done an extra effort on those fixes where needed. On top
of that, I have included catalogs.sgml, pgstatstatements.sgml,
explain.sgml, pg_verifybackup.sgml and wal.sgml in 13.

> doc/src/sgml/cube.sgml?
> doc/src/sgml/func.sgml?

These two are some beautification for the format of the function, so I
have left them out.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-29 09:26:45 Weird failure in explain.out with OpenBSD
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-12-29 09:18:27 Re: trailing junk in numeric literals