| From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers) |
| Date: | 2017-09-12 19:19:32 |
| Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.6a.443ce4a018803d09.15e7784f1d4@tc7-visena |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
På tirsdag 12. september 2017 kl. 21:11:45, skrev Robert Haas <
robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>>:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
<andreas(at)visena(dot)com> wrote:
> There are many ways to do/configure things it seems, resulting in many ifs
> and buts which makes section 10 rather confusing. I really think a complete
> example, with absolute paths, would be clarifying.
>
> I'm afraid many will still re-create standbys from scratch without a really
> good and complete example to follow.
And I'm afraid that they won't.
Yea. Put it that way - me too:-)
The consequences of not re-creating standbys from scratch and not
understanding section 10, and doing it wrong, are far worse...
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-09-12 19:21:50 | Re: pgbench regression test failure |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-12 19:16:56 | Re: domain type smashing is expensive |