Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers)
Date: 2017-09-12 19:11:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaSkRA9t0AN4LHvhnsJswj6sAsBt3uuAH1PhgHN7-UfnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
<andreas(at)visena(dot)com> wrote:
> There are many ways to do/configure things it seems, resulting in many ifs
> and buts which makes section 10 rather confusing. I really think a complete
> example, with absolute paths, would be clarifying.
>
> I'm afraid many will still re-create standbys from scratch without a really
> good and complete example to follow.

And I'm afraid that they won't.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-12 19:12:35 Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-12 19:09:38 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables