| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Jacob Champion' <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do |
| Date: | 2026-09-17 08:42:06 |
| Message-ID: | TYRPR01MB128454D7506104D43AD54817BF5B82@TYRPR01MB12845.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Jacob,
> Sounds fine in concept (though I wouldn't necessarily want to backport
> and/or skip beta review for this new section). Any recommended
> wording?
Yes, this cannot be backported. How about attached?
> Okay. Any thoughts on Bharath's note on "publication slot creation" above?
I could not find the term "publication slot" in the existing doc, so I prefer
his idea. Another one I came up with to just simplify:
```
Removing from output_plugin_libraries will cause future logical replication to
fail with an error. (Beware that existing replication tools may not degrade gracefully
if the server is configured in this way.)
```
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| kuroda.diffs | application/octet-stream | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexandre Felipe | 2026-09-17 08:43:04 | Re: pg_regress: schedule multi-line test groups |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2026-09-17 08:39:22 | Re: Logical Implication |