RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure

From: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com" <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
Date: 2022-02-17 04:32:26
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB58664ABD1AC9F42904017461F5369@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I understood here as removing following mechanism from core:
>
> * disable timeout at end of tx.

While reading again and this part might be wrong.
Sorry for inconvenience.
But anyway some codes should be (re)moved from core, right?

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-02-17 04:32:52 Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-02-17 04:14:04 Re: O(n) tasks cause lengthy startups and checkpoints