RE: [bug?] Is the format of tables in the documentation broken in PG 13?

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Daniel Gustafsson' <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [bug?] Is the format of tables in the documentation broken in PG 13?
Date: 2020-06-16 00:21:52
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB299071A031D0D04E867CEAB7FE9D0@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
> Yes, this was a deliberate change made to be able to fit more expansive
> descriptions of columns etc.

Thanks for your quick response and information. I'm relieved to know that it was not broken.

> That's less good. The W3C Web Accessibility Initiative has guidance for
> multi-
> level header tables which might be useful here.
>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/tables/multi-level/
>
> Maybe if we use the id and headers attributes we can give screen readers
> enough
> clues to make sense of the information?

Hm, I think I'll look into this.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-06-16 00:23:42 Re: language cleanups in code and docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-15 23:54:25 Re: language cleanups in code and docs