Quick Links

RE: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output

From:	<Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com>
To:	<dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc:	<Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	RE: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output
Date:	2021-06-16 02:17:41
Message-ID:	TYAPR01MB2896E337DE723DED12168F16C40F9@TYAPR01MB2896.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

>I had not really looked at the patch, but if there's a cleanup portion to the same
>patch as you're adding the YB too, then maybe it's worth separating those out
>into another patch so that the two can be considered independently.

I agree with this opinion. It seems to me that we should think about units and refactoring separately.
Sorry for the confusion.

Best regards,
Shinya Kato

In response to

Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output at 2021-06-15 15:33:05 from David Rowley

Responses

Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output at 2021-06-16 02:59:47 from David Christensen
Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output at 2021-06-29 17:11:12 from David Christensen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2021-06-16 02:44:29	Re: Improving isolationtester's data output
Previous Message	Peter Geoghegan	2021-06-16 01:48:27	Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops