RE: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: RE: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-09 14:07:00
Message-ID: TU4PR8401MB0797AFDE28ED744F2DE3A5BAEEBF0@TU4PR8401MB0797.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I tested this feature and found a document shortage in the columns added to the pg_constraint catalog.
The attached patch will add the description of the 'conincluding' column to the manual of the pg_constraint catalog.

Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda

-----Original Message-----
From: Teodor Sigaev [mailto:teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru]
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 3:20 PM
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>; Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>; Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>; PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Thank you, pushed.

Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Thank you, fixed
>
> I suggest that we remove some unneeded amcheck tests, as in the
> attached patch. They don't seem to add anything.
>

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_constraint.patch application/octet-stream 859 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-04-09 14:11:08 Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-09 14:06:24 Re: Boolean partitions syntax