Re: Boolean partitions syntax

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date: 2018-04-09 14:11:08
Message-ID: 27021281-2ED7-4CDE-9D82-366AF10B3B57@excoventures.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On Apr 9, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> writes:
>> +1 based on running the above scenario on my 10.3 instance and
>> receiving the same error. Is there a chance the fix could make it into
>> 10.4 then?
>
> It's premature to discuss whether this could be back-patched when
> we haven't got an acceptable patch yet.

Understood.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-09 14:19:40 Re: Documentation for bootstrap data conversion
Previous Message Shinoda, Noriyoshi 2018-04-09 14:07:00 RE: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.