Re: Boolean partitions syntax

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date: 2018-04-09 14:06:24
Message-ID: 11391.1523282784@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> writes:
> +1 based on running the above scenario on my 10.3 instance and
> receiving the same error. Is there a chance the fix could make it into
> 10.4 then?

It's premature to discuss whether this could be back-patched when
we haven't got an acceptable patch yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shinoda, Noriyoshi 2018-04-09 14:07:00 RE: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-09 14:04:26 Re: Transform for pl/perl