From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Boolean partitions syntax |
Date: | 2018-04-09 14:06:24 |
Message-ID: | 11391.1523282784@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> writes:
> +1 based on running the above scenario on my 10.3 instance and
> receiving the same error. Is there a chance the fix could make it into
> 10.4 then?
It's premature to discuss whether this could be back-patched when
we haven't got an acceptable patch yet.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shinoda, Noriyoshi | 2018-04-09 14:07:00 | RE: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-09 14:04:26 | Re: Transform for pl/perl |