Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree

Hi, Kirill

On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 17:46, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 17:44, Roman Khapov <rkhapov(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > I agree — the NULL handling seems wrong.
>> > Here's a quick patch to fix it. What do you think?
>>
>> LGTM, but maybe the test should be expanded with NULL for the two-column
>> indexes? I mean to add NULLs at zero column too.
>>
>> Also, about the tests but not related to NULLs...
>> Seems like we need to run those tests on 32bit system, the test output should be different?
>
> Yes, gin_1.out is for 32-bit output. Adding new tuples in relation
> will result in binary layout changes, so we need to update gin.out for
> 64 bit and gin_1.out for 32 bit
>

I only have a 64-bit system to work with.

I'm unsure how to produce the correct gin_1.out file for 32-bit architecture
while running on 64-bit.

Any advice or recommended workflow would be greatly appreciated!

--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.