| From: | Srirama Kucherlapati <sriram(dot)rk(at)in(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, AIX PG user <postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: AIX support |
| Date: | 2025-09-23 15:28:58 |
| Message-ID: | SJ4PPFB817783263D506AAE4C480F5B2866DB1DA@SJ4PPFB81778326.namprd15.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andres,
> It worked without meson changes just before the AIX support was dropped. I do
> not see why you *need* that meson patch, rather it just being convenient -
> after all I had made it work before, without that.
I was able to build successfully using Meson on PostgreSQL 16. However, when attempting the same on the latest master(with the revived changes), I encountered a few errors. We are currently investigating these issues and working on the necessary fixes.
I’ll keep you updated once the Meson-related fixes are ready.
> One suggestion I do have is to split the patch into a few constitutent pieces.
Thank you for the suggestion.
Splitting the patch into smaller, constituent pieces makes sense and would certainly help with clarity and review.
Appreciate your guidance.
Warm regards,
Sriram.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-09-23 15:34:45 | Re: plan shape work |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-09-23 15:11:06 | Re: Fix overflow of nbatch |