Re: AIX support

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: AIX PG user <postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AIX support
Date: 2025-09-23 14:36:47
Message-ID: 3xsqvatpnbb7wd3vdxdygzh6s2bbxn3ulmarli67x5u7hekvei@3it2vxprjglu
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-09-23 14:26:08 +0000, AIX PG user wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback and for highlighting the importance of Meson-based builds.
>
> We fully recognize the long-term objective of transitioning away from
> make-based builds, and we are actively working on reviving Meson support for
> AIX in alignment with that direction. However, we are currently encountering a
> few errors with the revived changes, and we are working actively to
> resolve them. I will keep you updated and share the finalized Meson-related
> changes at the earliest opportunity.

It worked without meson changes just before the AIX support was dropped. I do
not see why you *need* that meson patch, rather it just being convenient -
after all I had made it work before, without that.

> In the meantime, we would sincerely appreciate it if you/team could review the patch
> with respect to the gmake build and the associated source-level modifications
> submitted on commitfest.

I'd personally just not add gmake support at all, but ...

> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6050/
>
> Your input would be invaluable in helping us ensure the correctness and
> completeness of the implementation before we proceed further. Thank you once
> again for your continued guidance and support.

One suggestion I do have is to split the patch into a few constitutent pieces.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message suyu.cmj 2025-09-23 14:38:14 Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot()
Previous Message AIX PG user 2025-09-23 14:26:08 Re: AIX support