From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | AIX PG user <postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AIX support |
Date: | 2025-09-23 14:36:47 |
Message-ID: | 3xsqvatpnbb7wd3vdxdygzh6s2bbxn3ulmarli67x5u7hekvei@3it2vxprjglu |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-09-23 14:26:08 +0000, AIX PG user wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback and for highlighting the importance of Meson-based builds.
>
> We fully recognize the long-term objective of transitioning away from
> make-based builds, and we are actively working on reviving Meson support for
> AIX in alignment with that direction. However, we are currently encountering a
> few errors with the revived changes, and we are working actively to
> resolve them. I will keep you updated and share the finalized Meson-related
> changes at the earliest opportunity.
It worked without meson changes just before the AIX support was dropped. I do
not see why you *need* that meson patch, rather it just being convenient -
after all I had made it work before, without that.
> In the meantime, we would sincerely appreciate it if you/team could review the patch
> with respect to the gmake build and the associated source-level modifications
> submitted on commitfest.
I'd personally just not add gmake support at all, but ...
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6050/
>
> Your input would be invaluable in helping us ensure the correctness and
> completeness of the implementation before we proceed further. Thank you once
> again for your continued guidance and support.
One suggestion I do have is to split the patch into a few constitutent pieces.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | suyu.cmj | 2025-09-23 14:38:14 | Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot() |
Previous Message | AIX PG user | 2025-09-23 14:26:08 | Re: AIX support |