| From: | Rangaraj G <rangaraj(at)uniphore(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Memory and hard ware calculation : |
| Date: | 2019-01-21 11:24:07 |
| Message-ID: | SG2PR01MB3125ECE0241F24C18B237BECA59F0@SG2PR01MB3125.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi,
Memory and hard ware calculation :
How much memory required to achieve performance with the 6GB RAM, 8 Core, Max connection 1100 concurrent connection and O/p memory from procedure 1GB ?
Is there any changes required in hardware and work memory expansion ?
Regards
RANGARAJ G
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | andyterry | 2019-01-21 12:43:11 | commit within a procedure loop - cannot commite with subtransaction |
| Previous Message | bhargav kamineni | 2019-01-20 10:48:58 | Re: Capacity Planning |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cleiton Luiz Domazak | 2019-01-21 17:43:20 | Re: Memory and hard ware calculation : |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-01-21 08:56:45 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |