| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
| Date: | 2019-01-21 08:56:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5C45894D.6010109@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
(2019/01/21 17:21), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2019/01/21 17:17, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> (2019/01/19 21:17), Amit Langote wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:58 PM Etsuro Fujita
>>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>> I updated the patch as such and rebased it to the latest HEAD. I also
>>>> added the commit message. Attached is an updated patch. Does that make
>>>> sense? If there are no objections, I'll push that patch early next week.
>>>
>>> Thank you. Looks good to me.
>>
>> Cool. Pushed after tweaking the commit message based on the feedback from
>> Justin offlist and a self-review.
>
> Thank you.
One thing to add: I forgot back-patching :(, so I did that a little
while ago.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-01-21 09:01:39 | Re: speeding up planning with partitions |
| Previous Message | Amit Khandekar | 2019-01-21 08:33:16 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rangaraj G | 2019-01-21 11:24:07 | Memory and hard ware calculation : |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-01-21 08:21:46 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |