| From: | Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)sun(dot)med(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin |
| Date: | 1999-01-25 08:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990125113012.10994G-200000@sun.med.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello!
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Someone (you, according to the cvs logs) checked in an update to the
> > "expected" file for the datetime regress test, but didn't check in the
> > corresponding update to the test file itself. sql/datetime.sql is
> > still dated 1997 ...
>
> It came from someone, not sure who. Can someone comment? If not, let's
> back it out.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Probably that's me. The patch attached. Is there any problem?
Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.tripod.com/~phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| datetime-regression-patch | text/plain | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter T Mount | 1999-01-25 10:22:56 | Problem with 6.5 and tables >2Gb |
| Previous Message | Todd Graham Lewis | 1999-01-25 07:24:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code |