Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code

From: Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code
Date: 1999-01-25 07:24:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9901250223150.28041-100000@reflections.eng.mindspring.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Hmm. I don't know how bulletproof the snprintf/vsnprintf code we have
> is, but it might be worth comparing what Apache is using to see if
> theirs is better (and if they have a compatible copyright...).

I assume LGPL is license non grata? glib has a good *printf*
implementation...

--
Todd Graham Lewis 3249'N,8336'W (800) 719-4664, x2804
******Linux****** MindSpring Enterprises tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net

"Those who write the code make the rules." -- Jamie Zawinski

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 1999-01-25 08:31:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-01-25 06:46:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)