| From: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Reinke <reinke(at)e-softinc(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] non-Transaction logging |
| Date: | 1999-02-23 17:47:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.SGI.3.95.990223094707.9453C-100000@bleu.west.spy.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Jim Mercer wrote:
# on a slightly different tact, it would be a good thing(tm) if postmaster
# and the postgres backends used syslog for logging debug and other
# information.
#
# i've tried enabling debug via the postmaster command, and haven't ever
# seen anything overly useful.
For this type of logging, I pipe my postmaster to logger.
--
SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daryl W. Dunbar | 1999-02-23 17:51:28 | RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging |
| Previous Message | Jim Mercer | 1999-02-23 17:18:14 | Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging |