Re: index on a box

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin+postgres(at)spy(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: index on a box
Date: 2001-06-21 20:59:28
Message-ID: Pine.OSX.4.33.0106211358420.396-100000@dustinmobile
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Around 11:08 on Jun 21, 2001, Tom Lane said:

# If you say "SET enable_seqscan TO off", and repeat the EXPLAIN, do you
# get an indexscan plan?

Seq Scan on tmp (cost=100000000.00..100002500.84 rows=30434 width=92)

# I don't recommend doing such a SET for production purposes, but if
# this works then the problem is just inaccurate selectivity/cost
# estimation. I see that the on_pb operator has no selectivity estimator
# defined at all :-( ... as a quick hack, try setting its oprrest and
# oprjoin to be areasel and areajoinsel.

I'm not sure what you just said. :)

--
SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos 2001-06-21 21:08:36 strange way to crash
Previous Message Stock, Stuart H. 2001-06-21 20:49:41 RE: Error: cannot write block XX of XXXXX/XXXXX blind: resource tempo rarily unavailable