| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Kangmo, Kim" <ilvsusie(at)hanafos(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tuple concurrently updated |
| Date: | 2002-07-28 09:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207281801330.527-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kangmo, Kim" <ilvsusie(at)hanafos(dot)com> writes:
> > If the index on the same class,
> > two concurrent CREATE INDEX command can update pg_class.relpages
> > at the same time.
>
> Or try to, anyway. The problem here is that the code that updates
> system catalogs is not prepared to cope with concurrent updates
> to the same tuple.
I see. So the error is basically harmless, and can be rectified anyway
with an ANALYZE, right?
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-28 09:06:12 | Re: Virus Emails |
| Previous Message | Robert E. Bruccoleri | 2002-07-28 03:45:07 | Re: Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks |