On 7 Feb 2001, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> It is really not based on the FTI code in PostgreSQL, since with we started
> out with a Progress database last year before porting to PostgreSQL. The
> idea is the same though, a separate lookup table containing the words for
> exact matching. Last time I had a look at the clients database it had about
> 50-60K rows in the content table, which amounted to about ~3500K rows in
> the lookup table. Searches return results instantly even though most of
> them are joins involving 3-4 tables. The database(7.0.2) is running on a
> Sun 220R with one 450MHZ processor, 10000RPM disks, 1GB RAM and Solaris
> 7. (As a curiosity my P466 laptop with Linux is actually running PostgreSQL
> faster...)
>
> Since we're only doing exact searches, the index is utilized. But the
> quality isn't good enough - I would love to have language sensitive
> searches. "car" should match "cars" but not cartography and "ship"
> should/could match "boat" etc.
you can use ispell prefix/suffix for searching base words.