Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it>
Cc: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO>, "Jose' Soares" <sferac(at)nettuno(dot)it>, interfaces postgres <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Date: 1998-04-30 14:54:41
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980430105413.10212U-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Jose' Soares Da Silva wrote:

> On 30 Apr 1998, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
>
> > "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it> writes:
> >
> > > I vote for changing default date format to ISO-8601 to reflect
> > > PostgreSQL documentation and for adherence to Standard SQL92.
> >
> > Hear! Hear! Good standards beat silly conventions any day!
> >
> Seems that you don't like conventions Tom, but you want
> that all world use dates with American format.
> Seems that you want impose one convention.

Can someone inform me of what ISO-8601 exactly is?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-04-30 14:59:50 Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-04-30 14:52:47 Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jose' Soares Da Silva 1998-04-30 15:36:00 Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-04-30 13:08:17 Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC