Re: Maximum transaction rate

From: Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Maximum transaction rate
Date: 2009-03-13 18:17:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0903131115340.10022@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 14:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net> writes:
>>> You mean some layer (LVM) is lying about the fsync()?
>>
>> Got it in one.
>>
>
> I wouldn't think this would be a problem with the proper battery backed
> raid controller correct?

It seems to me that all you get with a BBU-enabled card is the ability to
get burts of writes out of the OS faster. So you still have the problem,
it's just less like to be encountered.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-13 18:38:01 Re: Maximum transaction rate
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-13 18:12:30 Re: Maximum transaction rate