Re: Maximum transaction rate

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Jack Orenstein <jack(dot)orenstein(at)hds(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Maximum transaction rate
Date: 2009-03-13 18:12:30
Message-ID: 1236967950.7023.68.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 14:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net> writes:
> > You mean some layer (LVM) is lying about the fsync()?
>
> Got it in one.
>

I wouldn't think this would be a problem with the proper battery backed
raid controller correct?

Joshua D. Drake

> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben Chobot 2009-03-13 18:17:54 Re: Maximum transaction rate
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-13 18:08:01 Re: text column indexing in UTF-8 database