Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Date: 2004-10-08 05:01:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0410081459480.23632@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:

> I agree that => restricts people in a way we are not at the moment. AS
> is a better idea but I also like IS, which makes more sense to me. IS is
> currently on the func_name_keyword list -- I *think* we could use it.
> What do you think?

Josh kindly pointed out the following on IRC:

call some_sp( user IS 19, session IS NULL );

AS now seems quite nice. :-)

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-10-08 05:02:05 Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-08 04:35:49 Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch