Re: Using older machines with PostgreSQL?

From: Peter Childs <blue(dot)dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using older machines with PostgreSQL?
Date: 2003-10-27 16:19:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0310271618100.31389@bluedragon.homelinux.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Paul Ganainm wrote:

>
> blue(dot)dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk says...
>
>
> > > Are there any issues in doing this that I should be aware of (apart from
> > > a speed penalty which I expect to have to pay)?
>
>
> > Should not be any problems. If you can get Linux on Postgres will
> > run. As with any database memory is important (but then memory is cheap) I
> > would surgest at least 256Mb more is preferable.
>
>
> I think that I have 32 MB on one machine and 48 on the other.
>
>
> If I install Linux with no GUI (just command line), will PostgreSQL
> work, or does it actually require that much RAM?

Postgres will run. just be careful what you set the buffers to.

Peter

>
>
> Paul...
>
>
> > Peter Childs
>
> --
>
> plinehan__AT__yahoo__DOT__com
>
> C++ Builder 5 SP1, Interbase 6.0.1.6 IBX 5.04 W2K Pro
>
> Please do not top-post.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-27 17:03:56 Re: Deadlock Detection
Previous Message Paul Ganainm 2003-10-27 16:10:34 Re: Using older machines with PostgreSQL?