Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Call for port reports

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-31 16:37:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310311733440.15991-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Odd.  I count ten inline functions in the backend:

> Why would only three of them fail?

I just remembered this Autoconf change:

2002-03-28  Kevin Ryde  <user42(at)zip(dot)com(dot)au>

        * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_INLINE): Test with a typedef return value,
        to avoid versions of HP C which don't allow that.

So there you have it.  Do we want to backpatch the new autoconf test, or
define inline to empty for this particular version of this platform, or
try to do without typedef'd types?  I prefer option 1.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-31 16:42:20
Subject: Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2003-10-31 16:34:53
Subject: Re: static pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group