Re: Call for port reports

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-31 17:02:57
Message-ID: 4180.1067619777@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_INLINE): Test with a typedef return value,
> to avoid versions of HP C which don't allow that.

> So there you have it. Do we want to backpatch the new autoconf test, or
> define inline to empty for this particular version of this platform, or
> try to do without typedef'd types? I prefer option 1.

Me too, if the patch isn't too big.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 17:05:06 Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-10-31 17:02:27 Re: 7.4RC1 planned for Monday