Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 19:20:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309122119010.1131-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian writes:

> I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
> because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
> specifically.  I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
> were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?

./configure --help | grep --relevant-stuff

Optional Features:
  --disable-FEATURE       do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no)
  --enable-FEATURE[=ARG]  include FEATURE [ARG=yes]

Optional Packages:
  --with-PACKAGE[=ARG]    use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
  --without-PACKAGE       do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)

Readline is a package, spinlocks are a feature.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tilo SchwarzDate: 2003-09-12 20:15:58
Subject: Re: plpython
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-09-12 19:18:02
Subject: Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Manfred SpraulDate: 2003-09-12 21:14:23
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous:From: Nigel J. AndrewsDate: 2003-09-12 18:37:34
Subject: Re: tsearch pfree error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group