Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

Bruce Momjian writes:

> I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
> because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
> specifically. I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
> were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?

./configure --help | grep --relevant-stuff

Optional Features:
--disable-FEATURE do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no)
--enable-FEATURE[=ARG] include FEATURE [ARG=yes]

Optional Packages:
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
--without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)

Readline is a package, spinlocks are a feature.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net