Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

OK. You'da boss. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
> > because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
> > specifically. I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
> > were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?
>
> ./configure --help | grep --relevant-stuff
>
> Optional Features:
> --disable-FEATURE do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no)
> --enable-FEATURE[=ARG] include FEATURE [ARG=yes]
>
> Optional Packages:
> --with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
> --without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
>
> Readline is a package, spinlocks are a feature.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073