| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and REVOKE on function |
| Date: | 2003-09-01 19:21:10 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0309012120380.1206-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Given that rbt is the owner of the object, I'm not sure that it is
> >> sensible to interpret the above as revoking his ability to grant
> >> privileges to others.
> >>
> >> Peter, any thoughts?
>
> > Has this been resolved?
>
> No. I was hoping Peter would comment before we decide what to do.
It's on my list, but it's tricky.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-09-01 19:45:19 | Re: Preliminary notes about hash index concurrency (long) |
| Previous Message | jconway | 2003-09-01 19:18:49 | Re: array constructor can't construct empty array |