Re: CLOSE command tag

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLOSE command tag
Date: 2003-04-22 13:11:16
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0304221217340.2497-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway writes:

> (i.e. the CLOSE command tag is "CLOSE CURSOR", which doesn't even appear
> to be a command)

The command tags are aligned with the SQL standard (see under <get
diagnostics statement>), which doesn't appear to make much sense in this
case, but it doesn't hurt anyone.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Overholt 2003-04-22 14:31:23 Re: TODO-list
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-04-22 12:23:24 Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing