Re: CLOSE command tag

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLOSE command tag
Date: 2003-04-23 01:30:24
Message-ID: 1051061423.370.431.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 09:11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The command tags are aligned with the SQL standard (see under <get
> diagnostics statement>), which doesn't appear to make much sense in this
> case, but it doesn't hurt anyone.

Fair enough.

If we're going to SQL-compliant here, there are a couple other command
tags that should be corrected: COMMIT -> COMMIT WORK, ROLLBACK ->
ROLLBACK WORK, UPDATE -> UPDATE WHERE, DELETE -> DELETE WHERE, etc.

Cheers,

Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-04-23 03:34:45 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Previous Message Philip Warner 2003-04-23 01:28:14 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?