Re: 7.4 Wishlist

From: Dennis Björklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Date: 2002-12-03 09:20:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0212031008540.9578-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:

> Now convert this query so that it only evaluates the date_part thing
> ONCE:
>
> select t.id, date_part('days',now()-t.stamp) from table_name t where
> date_part('days',now()-t.stamp) > 20;

Something like this could work:

select *
from (select t.id, date_part('days',now()-t.stamp) AS d
from table_name t) AS t1
where t1.d > 20;

That aside I also would like some sort of local names. Something like the
let construct used in many functional languages (not exaclty what you want
above, but still):

let t1 = select * from foo;
t2 = select * from bar;
in select * from t1 natural join t2;

But even though I would like to give name to subexpressions like above, I
still think postgresql should stick to standards as close as possible.

--
/Dennis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2002-12-03 09:45:41 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-03 06:57:59 Re: 7.4 Wishlist

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Christian Imbeault 2002-12-03 09:31:52 Re: Problem of Null Ordering
Previous Message Karel Zak 2002-12-03 09:13:21 Re: [GENERAL] One SQL to access two databases.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2002-12-03 09:45:41 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-12-03 09:19:39 Re: Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?