Re: orderRules() now a bad idea?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: orderRules() now a bad idea?
Date: 2002-10-15 18:53:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0210152031000.928-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Unless Jan has an objection, I think alpha is best, because it matches
> trigger rule odering. That original rule ordering isn't something
> anyone is going to figure out on their own.

But alphabetical? According to whose definition of the alphabet?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-10-15 18:54:03 Re: DROP USER weirdness in 7.2.1
Previous Message John Halderman 2002-10-15 18:53:46 foreign key problem with pg_dump under 7.3b2