Re: libpqxx

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpqxx
Date: 2002-08-13 17:18:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0208122209430.10067-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> Okay, but if we are going to pull libpqxx, what about the other lib's too?

Certain things apply to libpqxx that don't all apply to the others libs:
It is maintained and developed independently anyway. It's new and not
integrated yet. It's a different programming language. It's a
non-standard interface. It's big.

If there is ever going to be any motion toward separating parts of the
source tree, libpqxx has to be the start.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-08-13 17:19:01 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-08-13 17:10:19 Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS